<p>Populations
of roan antelope (<i>Hippotragus equinus</i>)
in southern Africa have experienced a drastic decline over the past few decades
and this situation has led to the development of intensive breeding programmes
to support conservation efforts. However, little is known about related welfare
aspects including stress-related physiological biomarkers. The present study
set out to establish a non-invasive method to monitor faecal glucocorticoid
metabolite (fGCM) concentrations as a measure of stress and determine fGCM concentrations
in relation to male reproductive activity and female reproductive status in the
roan antelope. An adrenocorticotrophic hormone challenge was performed using two
adult roan antelope (one male and one female) at Lapalala Wilderness Nature
Reserve, South Africa, to determine the suitability of five enzyme immunoassays
(EIA) for monitoring adrenocortical function in <i>H. equinus</i>. An 11-oxoaetiocholanolone
I EIA detecting 11,17 dioxoandrostanes performed best showing 17-20 folds
increases in fGCM concentrations after 12h-17h post-injection. The identified
EIA was then used to monitor fGCM concentrations during active and non-active reproductive
periods in males (n=3), and during periods of lactation, mating, gestation, and
postpartum in females (n=18). Males showed an overall 80% increase in fGCM
concentrations when reproductively active and females showed a progressively significant
increase in fGCM levels throughout pregnancy, with overall fGCM concentrations being
1.5- and 2.6-fold higher than the respective fGCM concentrations during periods
of lactation and mating. Furthermore, fGCM concentrations remained above baseline
for up to 21 days post-partum. A correlation between ecological parameters
(rainfall and temperature) and fGCM concentrations revealed elevated fGCM
concentrations during the dry season for males and females. The non-invasive
method validated in this study provides a valuable tool to quantify
stress-related biomarkers in roan antelope, and findings can be used to support
management decisions in conservation breeding facilities.</p>
Funding
This work was funded by the National Research Foundation through the SARChI Chair for Mammal Behavioural Ecology and Physiology (Grant number 64756)