University of Pretoria
Browse
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta alignments BenA.nex (19.37 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta alignments CaM.nex (20.32 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta alignments concat.nex (83.83 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta alignments ITS.nex (20.97 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta alignments RPB2.nex (13.71 kB)
.TREEFILE
sectBrevicompacta Iqtree_BenA.treefile (2.12 kB)
.TREEFILE
sectBrevicompacta Iqtree_CaM.treefile (2.06 kB)
.TREEFILE
sectBrevicompacta iqtree_concat.treefile (2.13 kB)
.TREEFILE
sectBrevicompacta Iqtree_ITS.treefile (1.98 kB)
.TREEFILE
sectBrevicompacta Iqtree_RPB2.treefile (0.92 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta model_BenA.txt (0.29 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta model_CaM.txt (0.28 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta model_concat.txt (0.54 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta model_ITS.txt (0.1 kB)
TEXT
sectBrevicompacta model_RPB2.txt (0.18 kB)
TEXT
sectChrysogena alignment BenA.nex (15.38 kB)
TEXT
sectChrysogena alignment CaM.nex (17.38 kB)
TEXT
sectChrysogena alignment concat.nex (72.28 kB)
TEXT
sectChrysogena alignment ITS.nex (17.44 kB)
TEXT
sectChrysogena alignment RPB2.nex (28.35 kB)
1/0
122 files

Phylogenetic analyses used for the re-identification of Penicillium and Talaromyces catalogued in South African culture collections

Download all (1.5 MB)
Version 2 2024-05-14, 11:00
Version 1 2024-05-14, 10:55
dataset
posted on 2024-05-14, 11:00 authored by Cobus VisagieCobus Visagie

DNA sequence datasets, alignments and phylogenetic trees used in a publication to describe eight Penicillium and three Talaromyces species. Datasets were aligned in MAFFT v. 7.490 (Katoh & Standley 2013) with the G-INS-I option selected, with alignments manually trimmed, adjusted and concatenated in Geneious where needed. The most appropriate partition schemes and substitution models were selected based on Bayesian information criterion using a greedy strategy implemented in PartitionFinder v. 2.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017), allowing gene regions, introns, exons and codon positions to be independent datasets. Phylogenies were calculated using both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian tree Inference (BI). ML was performed in IQtree v. 2.2.0 (Minh et al. 2020) with support in nodes calculated using a bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. BI was performed in MrBayes v. 3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012), with three sets of four chains (1 cold and three heated) and was stopped at an average standard deviation for split frequencies of 0.01 using the "stoprule". Trees were visualised in TreeViewer v. 2.0.1 (https://treeviewer.org/) and edited in Affinity Publisher 2.0.3 (Serif (Europe), Nottingham, UK) for publication. ML tree topologies were used to present the results, with both bootstrap and posterior probability values shown for the supported branches. Alignments, Partitionfinder results and phylogenetic trees were uploaded.


Funding

Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme (FBIP) of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, Grant No: 110442

the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (RISE) under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie, Grant No: 101008129

the University of Pretoria's University Capacity Development Programme (UCDP) Grant

History

Department/Unit

Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute

Sustainable Development Goals

  • 15 Life on Land