University of Pretoria
Browse
IMAGE
1_1_CrushingGrindingFlotationPlant.png (34.96 kB)
IMAGE
1_2_FlotationCell.png (3.02 MB)
IMAGE
1_3_CurvesOfMetallurgicalEfficiency.png (62.72 kB)
IMAGE
1_4_ModeledFlotationCircuit.png (200.71 kB)
IMAGE
2_1_AirRecovery.png (316.49 kB)
IMAGE
2_2_BubbleSize.png (314.07 kB)
IMAGE
2_3_TrueFlotation.png (326.82 kB)
IMAGE
2_4_WaterRecovery.png (249.01 kB)
IMAGE
2_5_EntrainedChalcopyrite.png (195.24 kB)
IMAGE
2_6_EntrainedGangue.png (251.16 kB)
IMAGE
2_7_Grade.png (324.49 kB)
IMAGE
2_8_Recovery.png (326.1 kB)
IMAGE
2_9_ComparisonOfEntrainmentModels.png (96.12 kB)
IMAGE
3_1_FlotationCircuitWithStabilisationControllers.svg (159.49 kB)
IMAGE
3_2_FlotationCircuitWithStabilisationAndOptimisationControllers.svg (204.77 kB)
IMAGE
3_3_BlockDiagramOfMPCControllerImplementation.svg (293.88 kB)
IMAGE
3_4_BlockDiagramOfPIDGradeAndRecoveryControllerImplementation.svg (310.03 kB)
IMAGE
4_1_GradeRecoveryCurvesComparingMPCToPIDManipulatingAirAndLevelSetpoints.png (393.7 kB)
IMAGE
4_2_GradeRecoveryTimePlotsComparingMPCToPIDManipulatingAirAndLevelSetpoints.png (403.77 kB)
IMAGE
4_3_GradeRecoveryControlActionPlotsComparingMPCToPIDManipulatingAirAndLevelSetpoints.png (619.6 kB)
1/0
39 files

A dynamic flotation model for real-time control and optimisation

figure
posted on 2023-03-02, 13:55 authored by Daniel OosthuizenDaniel Oosthuizen, Derik Le Roux, Ian CraigIan Craig

A state- and parameter observable flotation model was developed to be used in industrial flotation control and optimisation applications. What distinguishes this model from other models available in literature is that key parameters characterising flotation operation - that could previously only be calculated from manual sampling campaign results - can now be estimated in real-time using measurements that are commonly available on industrial flotation circuits.

The effect of air recovery on different flotation mechanisms is illustrated in Figures 2_1 – 2_8, highlighting the need to include non-linear effects such as air recovery as part of a model-based control strategy. A model-based control strategy using this approach needs to include both a controller and an estimator to compensate for variability, as shown in the structure in Figure 3_3. A linear non-model-based control solution was configured (Figure 3_4), to provide an indication of potential improvements of the model-based control solution over conventional linear control strategies. Simulation results are shown in Figures 4_1 – 4_9, with the non-linear model-based solution consistently outperforming the linear non-model-based solution. The non-linear model-based solution has the potential to improve circuit performance most when both pulp levels and air flow rates into flotation cells are used as manipulated variables, with significant potential to improve recovery to the concentrate without compromising grade. 

The ability to reject operational disturbances effectively and to compensate for variability in process characteristics are key components of a successful long-term control solution. Both these objectives (disturbance rejection in Figures 7_1 and 7_2, and parameter estimation in Figures 6_1 – 6_6) can be achieved when a non-linear model-based control strategy with a parameter- and state estimator capabilities are integrated in a structure as shown in Figure 3_3.

History

Department/Unit

Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering