DOCUMENT
Grouping of Interview Questions with answers.docx (38.11 kB)
DOCUMENT
1 Table of Lexical noun phrases.docx (14.81 kB)
DOCUMENT
2 Stance - Classification Lexis.docx (15.16 kB)
DOCUMENT
3 Stance - Generic references.docx (13.21 kB)
DOCUMENT
4 Table of Evaluative Lexis.docx (15.67 kB)
DOCUMENT
5 Syntactic Choice passive voice.docx (14.06 kB)
DOCUMENT
6 Knowledge Making Verb tense.docx (13.08 kB)
DOCUMENT
7 Knowledge Making Verb Type.docx (13.14 kB)
DOCUMENT
8 Knowledge Making Generic reference.docx (13.97 kB)
DOCUMENT
9 Generic & specific reference.docx (13.74 kB)
DOCUMENT
10 Knowledge making First person reference.docx (12.54 kB)
DOCUMENT
1 Degrees of assurance - evaluative lexemes.docx (15.38 kB)
DOCUMENT
2 Degrees of assurance - Modality.docx (14 kB)
DOCUMENT
3 Degrees of assurance - First person reference.docx (12.74 kB)
DOCUMENT
1 Textual Positioning Noun phrase length.docx (15.24 kB)
DOCUMENT
2 Textual Positioning Mono vs Multi-syllabic words.docx (12.76 kB)
DOCUMENT
3 Textual Positioning Linking devices.docx (13.97 kB)
DOCUMENT
Codes for Datasets.docx (13.22 kB)
1/0
Authorial voice in master's dissertations in education
The aim of this MEd study was to provide theoretical insight into how master’s students constructed voice in dissertation writing. The first data set involved the analsysis of 11 dissertations to examine authorial voice. Ivanič and Camps’ Voice Typology (2001) framework was applied to identify linguistic features that were used to construct authorial voice in the discussion section of the selected dissertations. For the second data set, the semi-structured interview data set, an analysis of the questions and relevant answers with four writers of the selected dissertations are included.
